The Crisis Report— 48

Let’s be CLEAR about what “Mainstream” Climate Science actually says. (Part Two)

Richard Crim
10 min readSep 22, 2024
From Comments on Global Warming Acceleration, Sulfur Emissions, Observations (16 May 2024) James Hansen, Pushker Kharecha, Makiko Sato.

Because, it’s the Science that our governments and leaders are using when they think about Climate Change and how to respond to it.

If you disagree with what’s being done, you are disagreeing with the current mainstream paradigm in Climate Science.

In Part One of this paper (The Crisis Report — 47) I boldly reduce Climate Science down to what I consider its “essentials”.

Climate Science boils down to just 5 key Points.

Everything else is “details”.

In Part One we looked at the two “most important” aspects of the Climate System: Climate Sensitivity and Latitudinal Gradient Sensitivity.

CLIMATE SENSITIVITY — How much will the Earth warm up if the atmospheric CO2 level is raised to 560ppm?

The essential problem with “climate sensitivity”. Is that after 130 years we still don’t know what value to assign to it.

Climate Alarmists think the Climate System is…

--

--

Richard Crim

My entire life can be described in one sentence: Things didn’t go as planned, and I’m OK with that.